Here you find all publications and drafts that we produced for HOPE.
HOPE policy briefs
- Briefing Sheet 1: What were the HOPE methods to study household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
- Briefing Sheet 2: Which mitigation actions are households willing to implement?
- Briefing Sheet 3: What are the reasons behind households’ preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
- Briefing Sheet 4: What role do health co-benefits play in households’ decision-making?
- Briefing Sheet 5: How can policies enable households to contribute to the 1.5°C goal?
HOPE research results
- Bothner, F., Dorner, F., Herrmann, A., Fischer, H., & Sauerborn, R. (2018). What are necessary and sufficient conditions for household choices of climate mitigation actions? – An empirical study in four European countries. Environmental Science and Policy (submitted).
- Wilkinson, P., Fischer, H., Louis, V.R., Herrmann, A., Amelung, D., Barbier; C., Dubois, G., Nadaud, F., Sköld, B., & Sauerborn, R. (2018). Multi-criteria assessment of household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: an analysis of household survey data from four European countries. Global Public Health (accepted).
- Moberg, K.R., Aall, C., Dorner, F., Reimerson, E., Ceron, J.-P., Sköld, B., Sovacool, B.K., & Piana, V. (2017). Mobility, food, and housing: Responsibility, individual consumption, and demand-side policies in European deep decarbonisation pathways. Energy Efficiency (accepted).
- Hermann, A., Fischer, H., Amelung, D., Litvine, D., Aall, C., Andersson, C., Baltruszewicz, M., Barbier, C., Bruyère, S., Bénévise, F., Dubois, G., Louis, V.R., Nilsson., M., Moberg, K. R., Sköld, B., Sauerborn, R. (2017). Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four european high-income countries : does health information matter? A mixed-methods study protocol, BMC Public Health. Download pdf
- Moberg, K. R., Louis, V., Aall, C., Baltruszewicz, M., Ceron, J.-P., Reimerson, E., & Dorner, F. (2016). HOPE for reducing consumption-related GHG emissions? Conference: 1.5 Degrees: Meeting the challenges of the Paris Agreement Environmental Change Institute – Oxford University. Download pdf
- Sauerborn, R., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Dubois, G., Wilkinson, P., & Louis, V. (2016). Household preferences to reduce their carbon footprint – a comparative study from 4 European cities. International Society for Environmental Epidemiology Annual Conference 2016, Rome.
- Neuendorf, F., Sauerborn, R., Health co-benefits and household preferences for reducing
greenhouse gas emission in Europe, Pitch Presentation, European Public Health Conference
- The HOPE tool – theoretical basis for simulating households’ greenhouse gas emission reduction
- Patterns of households’ greenhouse gas emissions: Comparative study of greenhouse gas footprints in four European high income countries
- Households choices in reducing their greenhouse gas emissions: results and methodological challenges of a 2-stage simulation in an urban household sample from Germany, France, Norway and Sweden
- Cost–effectiveness of households’ mitigation choices: a comparison of four European high income countries
- Households’ perceptions of their role in mitigating climate change – a four country comparison of Germany, France, Norway and Sweden
- Households’ preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions – motivators, barriers and policy implications
- Does health matter? Health as a motivator for engaging households in climate change mitigation